1 résultats pour "directness"

• The Directness Requirement in Intentional Torts

  The confusion surrounding the distinction between indirect and direct threats is most pertinent as to whether an assault is constituted by telephone communication. In Barton v Armstrong 5 , Taylor J held in the Supreme Court of New South Wales that threats made over the phone were capable of constituting an assault. It is very difficult to understand how this satisfies the directness and immediacy requirements. It must then be questioned whether a text-message or a recorded-call cons...