James Buchanan.
Publié le 10/05/2013
Extrait du document
«
John Slidell.
Slidell was instructed to insist that Mexico recognize the annexation of its former province, Texas, and that it pay certain long-standing claims of UnitedStates citizens.
As payment for the claims, Slidell was told to press for the Mexican territory lying between Texas and the Pacific Ocean.
The American demands werenot met, and soon afterward the Mexican War broke out in 1846.
D3 Cuba
While secretary of state, Buchanan also tried to further one of his favorite projects, the purchase of Cuba from Spain.
Spain turned down his offer of $120 million.However, for the remainder of his public career, Buchanan continued to urge that the United States acquire Cuba.
E Diplomatic Representative to Britain
When Polk's administration ended, Buchanan retired to his home at Wheatland, a country mansion outside Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
He worked unsparingly to win thepresidential nomination in 1852 and was the leading contender at the Democratic national convention that year.
But the weary, deadlocked delegates nominatedFranklin Pierce for president on the 49th ballot.
In 1853 President Pierce appointed Buchanan as U.S.
envoy to Britain.
The following year Secretary of State William L.
Marcy instructed Buchanan to meet with the envoy to Spain, Pierre Soulé, and the envoy to France, John Y.
Mason.
Theenvoys met at Ostend (Oostende), Belgium, and later at Aachen, Germany, and exchanged views on the best way to convince Spain to sell Cuba to the United States.They drafted their recommendations in a diplomatic dispatch that became known as the Ostend Manifesto.
It declared that if Spain refused to sell Cuba, “then, by everylaw, human and divine, we shall be justified in wresting it from Spain if we possess the power.” Word of the Ostend Manifesto reached the American press and becamean effective campaign document against the Democratic Party.
It was an explosive issue because Cuba, if it became a U.S.
possession, would presumably be admittedto the Union as a slave state.
F Election of 1856
Buchanan returned from his diplomatic post in London to take part in the Democratic national convention of 1856.
His political strength was formidable.
He had becomewell known because of the many high offices he had held.
Because he had been abroad, Buchanan had not been involved in the dispute over the controversial Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which opened new territories in the West to slavery.
Other leading Democrats, especially Senator Stephen A.
Douglas of Illinois, were no longerconsidered potential presidential candidates because they had supported the act.
Buchanan had the full backing of his home state, Pennsylvania, then the secondlargest state in the Union.
Moreover, his record of compromise on the slavery issue made him acceptable to the South.
Aided by the strong and skillful support of his Southern backers, Buchanan gained the Democratic nomination.
He campaigned on a conservative platform, stressing hisbelief that Congress should not interfere with slavery in the territories.
His major opponent was John C.
Frémont, the first presidential candidate of the newly organizedRepublican Party.
Frémont campaigned on the principle that Congress should prohibit slavery in the territories.
A third candidate was Millard Fillmore, a former presidentand now the candidate of the American Party.
Although the combined popular vote of his two opponents was greater than his own, Buchanan won the election.
He polled 174 electoral and 1,832,955 popular votes,compared to 114 electoral and 1,339,932 popular votes for Frémont and 8 electoral and 871,731 popular votes for Fillmore.
Buchanan owed his election to the supporthe received from the South and from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Indiana, Illinois, and California.
John C.
Breckinridge of Kentucky became Buchanan's vice president.
IV PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
A Panic of 1857
During Buchanan's administration the country suffered a short but severe economic depression.
The South escaped the worst effects of the so-called Panic of 1857, andthis convinced many Southerners of the superiority of their slave-supported economic system.
Senator James Hammond of South Carolina claimed triumphantly,“Cotton is King.” The panic heightened the conflict between the North and South.
B Slavery Controversy
The most important issue during Buchanan's presidency was the growing division between the North and the South over slavery.
On this issue, Buchanan followed therecommendations of the members of his Cabinet, who supported the South.
Although he defended the rights of the states and declared that continued agitation byabolitionists would justify secession, at the same time he believed in the Union and sought to prevent secession.
His general policy for resolving the conflict was one ofcompromise and conciliation, and he hoped that by these means the question could be settled peacefully.
Unfortunately his efforts at compromise were inadequate, andhe only aggravated an already explosive situation.
B1 The Dred Scott Decision
Only two days after Buchanan's inauguration, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in the Dred Scott Case, which Buchanan in his inaugural speech had predicted would lay to rest the question of slavery in the territories.
It did not do so.
The case was a test of congressional power to restrict slavery.
One ofthe chief questions was whether Scott, a black slave, had become a free man when his owner took him to reside in a territory (Minnesota) where Congress had barredslavery.
The answer, in the opinion by Chief Justice Roger B.
Taney (each justice wrote a separate opinion), was no, because slaves were property and the U.S.Constitution forbade Congress to deprive persons of their property without due process of law.
This answer did not settle the political and moral questions.
The Republican Party vigorously attacked the decision and the court.
Many antislavery Democrats desertedthe Democratic Party, leaving it more in the hands of proslavery elements than it had been before.
The decision made the breach between North and South wider, andthus brought the nation closer to war.
B2 Lecompton Constitution
Under the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Kansas could be organized as a slave or free territory, depending on the choice of its settlers.
When the act passed in 1854, settlers onboth sides of the issue moved to Kansas to influence the vote.
The antislavery forces formed a legislature in Topeka, Kansas, while those favoring slavery made theircapital at Lecompton.
Both Buchanan and his predecessor, President Pierce, recognized the proslavery territorial legislature in Lecompton as the legitimate government.When the proslavery body drafted its so-called Lecompton Constitution and submitted it to Congress for statehood in 1857, Buchanan pressed for its acceptance, evenafter the constitution failed a popular vote in Kansas.
Douglas protested bitterly that the president was trying to override the will of the people.
In an effort to.
»
↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓
Liens utiles
- James Buchanan - Biography.
- James Buchanan
- Buchanan, James
- Buchanan, James
- La Pensée et le mouvant de H. Bergson « sur le pragmatisme de William James » - commentaire