International trade
Publié le 10/12/2012
Extrait du document
«
In dealing with the first part of his quote, and retaliating against free trade critiques, Panagariya
refers to the examples of India and China, which experienced tremendous advances in the living
conditions of their population through opening to international markets.
The tendency of
neoliberals to ensure that the positive paths of countries that have previously adopted free trade
are a guarantee for success to all the other ones is eloquently brought up by Broad and Cavanagh
in The hijacking of the development debate.
In this article, they quote the neoliberal mentor
Thomas L.
Friedman who stated in one of his essays “we know the basic formula for economic
success” (Broad and Cavanagh, 2006).
Friedman also believes in the opening of trade as a
booster of economic growth through his analogy of a “flat world.” Indeed, this theorist believes
that a major side effect of global trade is technology propagation, which in return leads to
development.
He gives the example of little Indian children being able to access top of the line
software used by companies in New York (Friedman, 2005).
But in this way, and just as
Panagariya does through his example of China as a “growth miracle country”, these theorists tend
to generalize development and see it as a one size fits all process.
Panagariya must be really
careful when stating that poor governance is not an argument against free trade.
If we remain in
the discussion concerning development of poor countries, good governance should be dealt with
even before free trade actually.
As long as a very small elite has its hands on the resources of the
poor countries, the majority of the population will never enjoy the fruits of economic
advancement.
This is why the World Bank itself reviewed the philosophy behind its development
programs and ever since the early 1990s has been emphasizing on what is called grassroots
movements.
Another argument brought to the table by Arvind Panagariya and that is worth focusing on
is the one concerning multinational corporations.
This argument sends us back to our in class
lecture on the Doha round, and what it was going to focus on after the failures of the Uruguay.
»
↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓
Liens utiles
- SES chapitre 2 sociologie: Quels sont les fondements du commerce International et de l'internationalisation de la production ?
- Les États-Unis : unilatéralisme et multilatéralisme, un débat international
- Comment expliquer le commerce international de marchandises et services ?
- La structure du commerce international dans les années 1970
- le commerce international