Devoir de Philosophie

Chaadaev, Pëtr Iakovlevich

Publié le 22/02/2012

Extrait du document

Pëtr Chaadaev was the first Russian thinker for whom his own country became a philosophical problem. His works initiated the powerful Russian tradition of reflecting on Russia's whence and whither: that is to say, the meaning of Russian history, the character of Russian national identity, and the possible, or necessary, paths of Russian historical development in the future. However, Chaadaev's answer to these questions was mostly negative: he defined Russia not by what it was, but by what it was not. A paradoxical feature of Chaadaev's s position was that his general philosophical views did not apply to his native country. He was a convinced Westernizer, identifying Western development with universal human history, but Russia was in his view the opposite of the West, an exception to the general rules. His general social philosophy, deeply influenced by the French theocratic traditionalists, was inherently conservative, stressing the importance of supra-individual unity and of continuous historical traditions; in contrast with this, his philosophy of Russian history defined Russia as a country without unity and without history, thus lacking the basic conditions for a genuine conservatism. This view provoked a strong reaction among Russian Romantic conservatives: they accepted some aspects of Chaadaev's conservative critique of atomistic individualism but tried to refute his pessimistic view of Russia, by arguing that, in fact, not Russia but the West represented atomistic disintegration and incapacity for organic development.

« transcendent God; his emanation is the 'world consciousness' , that is, supra-individual social consciousness, living in tradition and developing with it; below is the empirical consciousness of isolated individuals; on the lowest rung is pre-human nature.

In this way Chaadaev combined the traditional theistic conception of a transcendent God with pantheistic emphasis on God's immanent presence in the world.

This was in tune with Christian Neoplatonism (which reached Chaadaev through the esoteric tradition in Freemasonry, as well as through Schelling, whom he personally met in 1825) and with the panentheistic religious ideas of the German Romantics. Chaadaev's conception of the 'social sphere' and supra-individual social consciousness provides the key to his philosophy of history.

Knowledge, he argued, is a form of collective consciousness.

Without society, that is, the supra-individual sphere which allows traditions to be handed down, human beings would never have emerged from the animal state.

Also in religious experience the social sphere is of decisive importance: through it alone can the individual come to know God and to become a vessel for the divine truth.

Therefore the surest way to God leads not through individualistic self-perfection or solitary ascetism but through strict observance of traditional norms and active participation in social life.

The highest aim of man is 'the annihilation of his personal being and the substitution for it of a perfectly social or impersonal being' .

The foundation of the inner unity of society is religion, whose necessary guardian is the institutionalized Church.

Ecclesiastical mediation between man and God is indispensable for salvation, since efforts to achieve unmediated, individualized contact with God weaken the discipline of the soul and bring about social disintegration. In his philosophy of history Chaadaev attempted to reconcile the notion of a transcendent Providence with an immanentist approach, looking for the inner patterns that govern events and transform history into a meaningful process.

The instruments of history are great, chosen individuals and historical nations, that is to say, nations which constitute supra-individual 'moral personalities' .

The mission of historical nations is to rise towards universality; hence they cannot lock themselves up in nationalistic particularisms and superstitions.

Since the time of Christ the substance of history and the focal point of 'world consciousness' is Christianity, and the purest, most 'historical' and 'social' , manifestation of Christianity is Catholicism.

The Renaissance and Reformation had destroyed the splendid unity of medieval Christendom and pushed humanity towards increasing social atomization and neo-paganism.

Now, however, this great spiritual crisis was drawing to a close.

The process of corruption had reached its lowest point but Christianity had not collapsed; on the contrary, there were signs of its imminent regeneration and progressive transformation. In defining this transformation Chaadaev followed the favourite idea of the post-Revolutionary French thinkers, both traditionalist (like de Maistre), and utopian socialist (like the Saint-Simonians): the idea of a renewed, socialized Christianity which was to bring about the 'socialization of societies' , the extension of Christianity from private life to public sphere, that is the effective 'ethicization' of social and political relations.

Christianity, he felt,. »

↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓