Devoir de Philosophie

Charleton, Walter

Publié le 22/02/2012

Extrait du document

The physician Walter Charleton was the first to introduce Epicurean atomism into England in the form advocated in France by Gassendi. Charleton's version of atomism, although largely derivative, was nevertheless influential. Together with his advocacy of a Christian hedonism, it helped to make both atomism in natural philosophy (with its associated mechanistic account of nature) and utilitarian theories in ethics acceptable to such thinkers as Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, John Locke and others associated with the foundation of the Royal Society, of which Charleton was himself an active early member. Walter Charleton was a physician who served both Charles I and Charles II, but his interests were always broader than medicine. He entered practice after studying at Magdalen Hall, Oxford, under John Wilkins, also one of the founders of the Royal Society. Charleton's quick rise to fame made him enemies, which in part explains his sad decline to poverty in later years after serving as President of the College of Physicians from 1689-91. Charleton's major philosophical writings were two books on the philosophy of Epicurus and two on central religious themes (the absurdity of atheism and the immortality of the soul). But it is important to appreciate that although he clearly saw himself as an exponent of a modified Christian version of the philosophy of Epicurus, in which he substantially followed in the footsteps of Gassendi, he was also almost equally influenced by the philosophy of Descartes. In each of them he found a commitment to mechanism as the basic explanatory concept for an understanding of nature, together with a theism which rejected a materialist account of the mind.

« only in his proof of God where he gives (with full acknowledgement) the causal argument offered by Descartes in the third Meditation, but also in a sharp dualism between mind and matter.

The soul is a substance perfectly distinct from that of body, he claims, and it is endowed with immortality by the character of its essence.

He follows Descartes, too, in holding that the idea of God is innate. In drawing on Descartes ' philosophy Charleton makes it clear that he wishes to distance himself from all those aspects of Epicurus that might be supposed to support atheism.

Like Gassendi and Descartes he was keen to make his account of the new philosophy not just compatible with, but actually supportive of a Christian theology.

At the same time he was quite sure that standard criticism of Epicurus was far too severe, as he made clear in the Introduction to his edition of Epicurus ' moral philosophy, Epicurus's Morals (1655).

Rather than being, as he was so often depicted, an advocate of impiety, gluttony and drunkenness, Epicurus was, Charleton urged, a great master of temperance, sobriety, continence and fortitude.

Charleton is quite prepared not only to admit but to argue that Epicurus was wrong on several fundamentals.

His three cardinal errors were his rejection of both the immortality of the soul and the worship of God, and his acceptance of suicide.

There were, nevertheless, extenuating circumstances which went some way towards excusing Epicurus these undoubted errors, principally his living in a pagan country before the advent of Christianity.

Granted the errors, Charleton, makes clear that he believes Epicurus has much to teach us about happiness and how it may be best obtained. In all his writings Charleton is careful not to appear dogmatic.

Nor was he ever an uncritical supporter of those who influenced him.

This is especially true of his later writings.

In his Natural History of the Passions (1674), for example, Charleton takes Descartes to task both for his bad anatomy (Charleton was an undoubted expert on anatomy) and for his inadequate explanation of the connection between mind and body. Charleton died in poverty in Nantwich.

His major influence was through the Physiologia , which introduced many English speakers to atomism, including the young Isaac Newton .

His other works contributed to that assault on traditional teaching and the adoption of the mechanistic and hedonistic philosophies that came to dominate the eighteenth century.. »

↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓

Liens utiles