Devoir de Philosophie

Bridgman, Percy William

Publié le 22/02/2012

Extrait du document

Bridgman founded high-pressure experimental physics and was committed to a classical empiricist view of science - a view challenged by twentieth-century developments in relativistic and quantum mechanics. He argued that developments in special relativity showed the experimental operations scientists performed were suitable substitutes for basic constituents of matter, thus founding operationalism, a methodological position which influenced logical positivism and, transformed beyond his recognition, was expropriated by the behaviourist school in the social sciences. As Bridgman grappled with the challenges of general relativity and quantum mechanics, he increasingly parted company with his positivistic and behaviourist followers by moving more towards subjectivist views of science and knowledge. These later views led him to see and explore intimate connections between foundations of scientific knowledge and human freedom.

« physicist does .

What is real is what is meaningful and 'we mean by any concept nothing more than a set of operations; the concept is synonymous with the corresponding set of operations' .

Each operation thus defines a separate concept.

For Bridgman the measuring operations were the only permanent physical entities.

Bridgman saw operationalism as a method for analysis - for sorting out what was and was not real among scientific assertions - and not a criterion for regimenting or demarcating the scientific from the unscientific as others interpreted it ( Operationalism ). Bridgman later moved from the idea that meanings of scientific claims were the operations the scientist performed to the view that knowledge is the product of human activity and rests on acts of the understanding - an essential private knowledge component that is not to be compromised by externally imposed demands for consistency. Critics accused Bridgman of flirting with solipsism, a charge he steadfastly denied. Bridgman interpreted general relativity theory as reintroducing absolutes to science.

Since he had come to reject all absolutes, Bridgman rejected general relativity theory.

His attempts to reconcile quantum theory and thermodynamics focused on what they showed about the limits of human subjectivity, reinforcing his rejection of all absolutes as unknowable.

Metaphysical and other absolutes including absolute ethical principles thus were illegitimate vehicles for imposing conformity of intellect on others. In subjectivity of knowledge Bridgman found the source of cognitive freedom: to be scientific is to rely on the intellect, accepting only what is operationally knowable, and thus is the paradigm of intellectual integrity. Intellectual integrity is the essence of freedom.

In social, moral and political realms, the path to freedom is to be scientific.

What was real socially and what was morally binding were what was true.

To assess truth one relied on operational analysis.

In The Intelligent Individual and Society (1938 ) he subjected social and moral concepts to operational analysis, arguing that 'duty' , 'responsibility' , the idea of a 'right' , and 'justice' all fail to have operational meaning and thus have only coercive utility.

So, too, the state fails to exist as an entity in its own right. Bridgman rejected the idea that 'the best and deepest interests of the individual are coincident with those of society' .

Rather than embracing solipsism he found that the key to individual freedom from authority is one's isolation and subjectivity.

Freedom is the only ultimate.. »

↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓

Liens utiles