Devoir de Philosophie

Chinese philosophy

Publié le 22/02/2012

Extrait du document

Any attempt to survey an intellectual tradition which encompasses more than four thousand years would be a daunting task even if it could be presumed that the reader shares, at least tacitly, many of the assumptions underlying that tradition. However, no such commonalities can be assumed in attempting to introduce Asian thinking to Western readers. Until the first Jesuit incursions in the late sixteenth century, China had developed in virtual independence of the Indo-European cultural experience and China and the Western world remained in almost complete ignorance of one another. The dramatic contrast between Chinese and Western modes of philosophic thinking may be illustrated by the fact that the tendency of European philosophers to seek out the being of things, the essential reality lying behind appearances, would meet with little sympathy among Chinese thinkers, whose principal interests lie in the establishment and cultivation of harmonious relationships within their social ambiance. Contrasted with Anglo-European philosophic traditions, the thinking of the Chinese is far more concrete, this-worldly and, above all, practical.

« intellectuals themselves, to threaten societal well-being.

Harmonious interaction was finally more important to these thinkers than abstract issues of who had arrived at the 'truth' .

Perhaps the most obvious illustration of the way the Chinese handled their theoretical conflicts is to be found in mutual accommodation of the three emergent traditions of Chinese culture, Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism.

Beginning in the Han dynasty (206 BC-AD 220), the diverse themes inherited from the competing 'hundred schools' of pre-imperial China were harmonized within Confucianism as it ascended to become the state ideology.

From the Han synthesis until approximately the tenth century AD, strong Buddhist and religious Daoist influences continued to compete with persistent Confucian themes, while from the eleventh century to the modern period, Neoconfucianism - a Chinese neoclassicism - absorbed into itself these existing tensions and those that would emerge as China, like it or not, confronted Western civilization. In the development of modern China, when Western influence at last seemed a permanent part of Chinese culture, the values of traditional China have remained dominant.

For a brief period, intellectual activity surrounding the May Fourth movement in 1919 seemed to be leading the Chinese into directions of Western philosophic interest. Visits by Bertrand Russell and John Dewey, coupled with a large number of Chinese students seeking education in Europe, Great Britain and the USA, promised a new epoch in China's relations with the rest of the world. However, the Marxism that Mao Zedong sponsored in China was 'a Western heresy with which to confront the West' .

Mao's Marxism quickly took on a typically 'Chinese' flavour, and China's isolation from Western intellectual currents continued essentially unabated. 1 Chinese thinking as ars contextualis Our traditional Western senses of order are grounded upon cosmogonic myths that celebrate the victory of an ordered cosmos over chaos.

Chaos is a 'yawning gap' , a 'gaping void'; it is an emptiness or absence, a nothingness; it is a confused mass of unorganized surds.

Hesiod's Theogony tells how the yawning gap of Chaos separating Heaven and Earth was overcome by Eros - love thereby creating harmony ( Hesiod ).

The Book of Genesis tells how, from a 'dark , formless void' , order was created by divine command.

In the Timaeus , Plato's Demiurge 'persuades' the disorganized, intransigent matter into reasonable order, providing 'a victory of persuasion over necessity' .

Classical Chinese culture, on the other hand, was little influenced by myths which contrasted an irrational Chaos with an ordered Cosmos.

The relative unimportance of cosmogonic myths in China helps to account for the dramatically different intellectual contexts from which the Chinese and Western cultural sensibilities emerged. In the Western tradition, thinking about the order of things began with questions such as 'What kinds of things are there? ' and 'What is the nature ( physis ) of things? ' This inquiry, which later came to be called 'metaphysics' , took on two principal forms.

One, which the scholastics later termed ontologia generalis (general ontology), is the. »

↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓

Liens utiles