Devoir de Philosophie

Cubism I INTRODUCTION Cubism, movement in modern art, especially in painting, invented by Spanish artist Pablo Picasso and French artist Georges Braque in 1907 and 1908.

Publié le 12/05/2013

Extrait du document

picasso
Cubism I INTRODUCTION Cubism, movement in modern art, especially in painting, invented by Spanish artist Pablo Picasso and French artist Georges Braque in 1907 and 1908. Although the look of cubism and the ideas behind it evolved over time, cubism retained certain general characteristics throughout. Cubist paintings create an ambiguous sense of space through geometric shapes that flatten and simplify form, spatial planes that are broken into fragments, and forms that overlap and penetrate one another. Art historians generally consider cubism to have been the most influential art movement of the first half of the 20th century. II ORIGINS Les Demoiselles d'Avignon The origins of cubism date to Spanish artist Pablo Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon (Museum of Modern Art, New York City), according to many art historians. The 1907 painting depicts five women in a brothel. The artist distorted the women's anatomy and facial features into broken planes. Masks from Africa and Oceania may have influenced Picasso in his treatment of the womens' faces. © 2008 Estate of Pablo Picasso / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York./SuperStock The exact date of cubism's first appearance in art has been the subject of heated debate among art historians. Some see its onset in Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon (1907, Museum of Modern Art, New York City), a painting of women composed of jagged shapes, flattened figures, and forms borrowed from African masks. Other historians feel that the influence of French artist Paul Cézanne on the work of Picasso and Braque provided the primary catalyst for the new movement. Before his death in 1906, Cézanne increasingly simplified and flattened forms. In addition, Cézanne began to use what art historians have called passage, a device in which one physical object is allowed to penetrate another physical object. In a painting of Mont Sainte-Victoire (1902-1904, Philadelphia Museum of Art), for example, Cézanne left the outer contour of the mountain unfinished so that at intervals no clear boundary separates the sky from the mountain. This innovation--allowing air and rock to merge and interpenetrate--became especially important to the cubists for two reasons. First, passage defied the laws of physical experience. Second, it encouraged artists to view paintings as having an internal logic--or integrity--that functions independently of, or even contrary to, physical experience. Profoundly influenced by these late Cézanne paintings, Picasso and Braque executed a series of landscapes in 1908 that were very close to Cézanne's, both in their color scheme (dark greens and light browns) and in their drastic simplification of form into geometric shapes. In Braque's Houses at L'Estaque (1908, Kunstmuseum, Bern, Switzerland) and in Picasso's Houses on the Hill, at Horta de Ebro (1909, Museum of Modern Art, New York), houses have a three-dimensional, cubic quality. It was upon seeing these paintings that French art critic Louis Vauxelles coined the term cubism. Mont Sainte-Victoire by Cézanne French artist Paul Cézanne painted Mont Sainte-Victoire, a mountain near his home in Provence in southern France, on many occasions. Over time, the images he produced became flatter, less realistic, and more abstract. In this late version, painted from 1902 to 1904, patches of color barely indicate the mountain, sky, and foreground, while creating a rhythmic pattern across the painting's surface. The mountain and sky, both intensely blue, appear almost to merge. Philadelphia Museum of Art/Corbis In these early cubist paintings, Picasso and Braque introduced other devices that undermine the illusion of space. For example, they abandoned conventional perspective: Buildings, instead of appearing one behind the other, appear one on top of the other. Moreover, in Houses at Horta, Picasso not only reduced the houses into cubic shapes but also transformed the background in the same manner. By treating earth and sky in the same way, Picasso made the canvas appear more unified, but in the process he also introduced ambiguity--by no longer differentiating what is solid from what is void. The first cubist paintings also stood out because they avoided using a consistent light source, unlike paintings that seek to create the illusion of three-dimensional space. In some parts of cubist paintings, light appears to cast shadows from the left; in others, from the right, the top, or the bottom. In addition, planes intersect in ways that leave the spectator guessing whether angles are concave or convex. A delight in confusing the spectator is a regular feature of cubism. III ANALYTICAL AND SYNTHETIC CUBISM: PICASSO AND BRAQUE Art historians generally divide Picasso and Braque's early cubism into two phases. Analytical cubism, the earlier phase, continued until 1912. It was followed by synthetic cubism, which lasted through 1915. Analytical cubism fragments the physical world into intersecting geometric planes and interpenetrating volumes. Synthetic cubism, by contrast, synthesizes (combines) abstract shapes to represent objects in a new way. A Analytical Cubism By 1910, when Picasso painted his Portrait of Ambroise Vollard (Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow, Russia), the language of cubism had become flatter and more consistent, but also more ambiguous. In this work, Picasso fragmented a human figure into a series of transparent geometric planes that intersect at a variety of angles. But none of these planes give the illusion of three-dimensionality--that is, of volume as in a cube. By this stage in analytical cubism, it had become progressively evident that there were no cubes in cubism. In fact, Picasso seemed to be dismantling the idea of three-dimensional form altogether, not only by fragmentation, but also by his use of Cézanne's passage technique. With Portrait of Ambroise Vollard Picasso merged figure and environment, solid and void, background and foreground. The resulting composition is visually consistent but does not appear to conform to the physical laws of nature. On the basis of analytical cubism's fragmented, intersecting planes, many people have argued that the underlying intention of cubist artists was to depict an object or human figure from multiple perspectives. For example, the mouth of a bottle might be shown from the top, with the rest of the bottle shown in profile. But this is only one aspect of cubism and does not account for much of its appearance. A more persuasive interpretation is that cubism aimed to invent a new visual language that had its own internal logic and consistency, one that did not attempt to imitate nature directly. The cubists never intended to depict nature accurately, whether from one point of view or many. After all, Picasso and Braque intentionally limited their color scheme to dark browns and grays, an approach that could only have resulted from a radical departure from nature. B Synthetic Cubism Georges Braque: Guitare et verre French artist Georges Braque painted Guitare et verre (Guitar and Glass, 1921) in the synthetic cubist style. Braque worked in conjunction with Spanish artist Pablo Picasso to develop the 20th-century art movement known as cubism. Cubist painting had two phases, called analytical and synthetic. The first, analytical cubism, is characterized by the use of monochromatic color schemes and flat, fragmented forms. With synthetic cubism, color and decoration played a greater role, and the technique of collage was introduced. © 2008 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris. Scala/Art Resource, NY A technique called collage, invented by Picasso, initiated the second phase of cubism in 1912. Collage, from the French word coller meaning "to glue," involved pasting a piece of paper or other material to the surface of a painting. In his Still Life with Chair Caning (1912, Musée Picasso, Paris, France), Picasso included a piece of oil cloth printed to look like chair caning. This was a radical act, for nobody had ever before put anything but paint on a painting. Just as important, oil cloth was a material that had had no previous connection with art. Its inclusion implied that art could be created with scissors and glue as well as with brushes and paint. Both Picasso and Braque began to include bits of newspaper, wallpaper, or advertising in their paintings. Collage opened the door for any object or material, however ordinary, to be included within (and possibly even to replace) a work of art. Reinforcing this tendency to merge art with outside elements was the inclusion in Still-life with Chair Caning of the painted letters JOU, a reference to the beginning of the word journal (French for "newspaper") or possibly to the word jouer (French for "to play"). Picasso, after all, was playing with forms. In this work, Picasso combined several visual languages (such as paint, oil cloth, and newsprint) with a verbal language (the lettering). Picasso's The Three Musicians Spanish painter Pablo Picasso used figures from the circus and the theater in a number of his works. The Three Musicians (1921) features two characters from Italian commedia dell'arte theater--Harlequin in the diamond-patterned costume and Pierrot in white. Some experts believe that Harlequin represents Picasso himself. © 2008 Estate of Pablo Picasso / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. Photo: Philadelphia Museum of Art, Pennsylvania/Giraudon, Paris/SuperStock© 2002 Fondazione Pablo Picasso / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. Foto: Philadelphia Museum of Art, Pennsylvania/Giraudon, Parigi/SuperStock Instead of working toward a consistent, unified surface as analytical cubism had done, synthetic cubism tended toward multiplicity by combining a variety of styles, surfaces, and visual languages into one painting. In Braque's Clarinet (1913, Museum of Modern Art, New York City), for instance, the artist combined representational drawing with abstract shapes to suggest a still life. Some forms are flat, whereas others, though simplified, appear three-dimensional and cast shadows. Synthetic cubism routinely combined abstract and representational forms, as well as a variety of textures: wood grain, sand, printed matter, and so on. Sometimes these different textures were incorporated by means of collage; other times the artist simply painted an area to look like another surface, such as wood. The later work of Picasso and Braque underwent numerous stylistic changes, but a great deal of it continued to show the influence of cubism. However, the ways that they used cubism no longer fit neatly into the strictly defined categories of analytical or synthetic cubism. IV OTHER CUBISTS Juan Gris: Breakfast Spanish-born French artist Juan Gris's innovative use of collage in the first decades of the 20th century influenced the development of synthetic cubism, which involved constructing paintings and drawings from shapes cut out of paper. Breakfast is in the collection of the Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris, France. Giraudon/Art Resource, NY Many artists took up cubism, but in ways and with intentions different from those that motivated Picasso and Braque. Picasso and Braque were reluctant to explain their work verbally, but French artists Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes wrote a cubist manifesto in 1912. That same year Metzinger and Gleizes helped found a group called Section d'Or (Golden Section) to exhibit and promote the work of cubists. Spanish-born French painter Juan Gris pursued his own version of cubism in works such as Breakfast (1915, Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris). The geometric fragmentation, mixture of drawing styles, and use of lettering in this painting are clearly cubist, but each individual plane remains distinct, without the interpenetration or transparency characteristic of Picasso's or Braque's cubism. In the painting L'Artillerie (1911, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City), French painter Roger de la Fresnaye used geometric simplification not to suggest ambiguity or to play with forms, but to make a patriotic statement on French military prowess. American painter Lyonel Feininger, in Franciscan Church (1924, Staatsgalerie, Stuttgart, Germany), used cubism to suggest religious feeling, an almost supernatural sanctity evoked by a church facade. Delaunay's Eiffel Tower French artist Robert Delaunay combined the fragmented forms of cubism with the vivid colors of fauvism. In Eiffel Tower (1910-1911), he depicted the famous Paris landmark from several different viewpoints at once. In combining the sensory experiences of several moments into one image, he sought to reflect the speed and pressure of modern urban life. Giraudon/Art Resource, NY Other artists, such as French painter Fernand Léger, pushed cubism in a direction that Braque and Picasso had refused to go--toward pure abstraction. In Contrast of Forms (1913, Guggenheim Museum, New York) Léger used the language of geometry to achieve a thoroughly abstract painting. And although Léger's painted forms are abstract, their metallic quality suggests a celebration of modern industry. This approach was at odds with that of Picasso and Braque, which was more introspective and contemplative, focused on the life of the artist's studio. V CUBISM'S INFLUENCE At the Seaside Painter and writer Wyndham Lewis was the chief figure in the British art movement known as vorticism. The angular, machinelike forms of Lewis's work show the influence of both cubism and futurism. At the Seaside, painted in 1913, is in the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, England. Victoria and Albert Museum/Art Resource, NY Many other artists were profoundly affected by cubism, but their use of the cubist language so differed from that of Picasso and Braque in appearance and intent that they eventually founded separate art movements. Among the movements most pointedly marked by cubism were Italian futurism, English vorticism, and Russian rayonism, all variations on cubist fragmentation. The Russian suprematism and constructivism movements, as well as the Dutch movement known as De Stijl, took the geometric fragmentation of cubism to a level of total abstraction similar to that of Léger. Cubism had a strong influence on many members of the German expressionism movement, who used its forms to express more personal, emotional meanings. The dada movement, with its provocative approach to mixing words with pictures and art with nonart, could not have existed without the cubist invention of collage. The surrealism movement of the 1920s and 1930s was indebted to cubism through its use of intentionally ambiguous imagery. And the abstract expressionism movement of the 1940s and 1950s owed to cubism its insistence on the flatness of the picture plane. Although cubism was mainly a movement in painting, it also had a marked impact on modern sculpture. Those who translated the language of cubism into solid sculptural form include French sculptors Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens, and Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Ukrainian sculptors Alexander Archipenko and Vladimir Baranoff-Rossiné. Contributed By: Claude Cernuschi Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
picasso

« Mont Sainte-Victoire by CézanneFrench artist Paul Cézanne painted Mont Sainte-Victoire, a mountain near his home in Provence in southern France, onmany occasions.

Over time, the images he produced became flatter, less realistic, and more abstract.

In this late version,painted from 1902 to 1904, patches of color barely indicate the mountain, sky, and foreground, while creating a rhythmicpattern across the painting’s surface.

The mountain and sky, both intensely blue, appear almost to merge.Philadelphia Museum of Art/Corbis In these early cubist paintings, Picasso and Braque introduced other devices that undermine the illusion of space.

For example, they abandoned conventionalperspective: Buildings, instead of appearing one behind the other, appear one on top of the other.

Moreover, in Houses at Horta , Picasso not only reduced the houses into cubic shapes but also transformed the background in the same manner.

By treating earth and sky in the same way, Picasso made the canvas appear more unified,but in the process he also introduced ambiguity—by no longer differentiating what is solid from what is void. The first cubist paintings also stood out because they avoided using a consistent light source, unlike paintings that seek to create the illusion of three-dimensional space.In some parts of cubist paintings, light appears to cast shadows from the left; in others, from the right, the top, or the bottom.

In addition, planes intersect in ways thatleave the spectator guessing whether angles are concave or convex.

A delight in confusing the spectator is a regular feature of cubism. III ANALYTICAL AND SYNTHETIC CUBISM: PICASSO AND BRAQUE Art historians generally divide Picasso and Braque’s early cubism into two phases.

Analytical cubism, the earlier phase, continued until 1912.

It was followed by syntheticcubism, which lasted through 1915.

Analytical cubism fragments the physical world into intersecting geometric planes and interpenetrating volumes.

Synthetic cubism,by contrast, synthesizes (combines) abstract shapes to represent objects in a new way. A Analytical Cubism By 1910, when Picasso painted his Portrait of Ambroise Vollard (Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow, Russia), the language of cubism had become flatter and more consistent, but also more ambiguous.

In this work, Picasso fragmented a human figure into a series of transparent geometric planes that intersect at a variety ofangles.

But none of these planes give the illusion of three-dimensionality—that is, of volume as in a cube.

By this stage in analytical cubism , it had become progressively evident that there were no cubes in cubism.

In fact, Picasso seemed to be dismantling the idea of three-dimensional form altogether, not only by fragmentation, butalso by his use of Cézanne's passage technique .

With Portrait of Ambroise Vollard Picasso merged figure and environment, solid and void, background and foreground. The resulting composition is visually consistent but does not appear to conform to the physical laws of nature. On the basis of analytical cubism’s fragmented, intersecting planes, many people have argued that the underlying intention of cubist artists was to depict an object orhuman figure from multiple perspectives.

For example, the mouth of a bottle might be shown from the top, with the rest of the bottle shown in profile.

But this is onlyone aspect of cubism and does not account for much of its appearance.

A more persuasive interpretation is that cubism aimed to invent a new visual language that hadits own internal logic and consistency, one that did not attempt to imitate nature directly.

The cubists never intended to depict nature accurately, whether from onepoint of view or many.

After all, Picasso and Braque intentionally limited their color scheme to dark browns and grays, an approach that could only have resulted from aradical departure from nature. B Synthetic Cubism Georges Braque: Guitare et verreFrench artist Georges Braque painted Guitare et verre (Guitar and Glass, 1921) in the synthetic cubist style.

Braqueworked in conjunction with Spanish artist Pablo Picasso to develop the 20th-century art movement known as cubism.Cubist painting had two phases, called analytical and synthetic.

The first, analytical cubism, is characterized by the use ofmonochromatic color schemes and flat, fragmented forms.

With synthetic cubism, color and decoration played a greaterrole, and the technique of collage was introduced.© 2008 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris.

Scala/Art Resource, NY A technique called collage, invented by Picasso, initiated the second phase of cubism in 1912.

Collage, from the French word coller meaning “to glue,” involved pasting a piece of paper or other material to the surface of a painting.

In his Still Life with Chair Caning (1912, Musée Picasso, Paris, France), Picasso included a piece of oil cloth printed to look like chair caning.

This was a radical act, for nobody had ever before put anything but paint on a painting.

Just as important, oil cloth was a material thathad had no previous connection with art.

Its inclusion implied that art could be created with scissors and glue as well as with brushes and paint.

Both Picasso andBraque began to include bits of newspaper, wallpaper, or advertising in their paintings.

Collage opened the door for any object or material, however ordinary, to beincluded within (and possibly even to replace) a work of art. Reinforcing this tendency to merge art with outside elements was the inclusion in Still-life with Chair Caning of the painted letters JOU, a reference to the beginning of the word journal (French for “newspaper”) or possibly to the word jouer (French for “to play”).

Picasso, after all, was playing with forms.

In this work, Picasso combined several visual languages (such as paint, oil cloth, and newsprint) with a verbal language (the lettering).. »

↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓

Liens utiles